Re: [PATCH] kdb: use __ktime_get_real_seconds instead of __current_kernel_time

[Daniel Thompson]

On 12/10/17 23:40, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 16:06:11 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > kdb is the only user of the __current_kernel_time() interface, which is
> > not y2038 safe and should be removed at some point.
> >
> > The kdb code also goes to great lengths to print the time in a
> > human-readable format from 'struct timespec', again using a non-y2038-safe
> > re-implementation of the generic time_to_tm() code.
>
> Is it really necessary for the kdb `summary' command to print the
> time/date?  Which puppies would die if we just removed it all?

kdb may enter spontaneously (BUG(), etc) so it can be useful if one 
returns from an overnight test run to know how long things survived.

It would almost certainly be possible for a skilled user to reconstruct 
the time of death. Having said that, one of the things you can do with 
kdb (although I admit *I* have never done it) is leave a macro command 
in the hands of an unskilled user.

Short summary: no puppies would die, but perhaps some might go hungry 
for a little while when their owner is late home?


Daniel.