Re: [PATCH 4.13 0/2] 4.13.7-stable review

[Shuah Khan]

On 10/13/2017 08:05 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 10/12/2017 06:09 PM, John Stultz wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 10/12/2017 03:26 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.13.7 release.
>>>> There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>>> let me know.
>>>>
>>>> Responses should be made by Sat Oct 14 21:25:27 UTC 2017.
>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>>
>>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>>>       kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.13.7-rc1.gz
>>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>>>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.13.y
>>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
>>> kselftest run regression since 4.13.6
>>>
>>> selftests: posix_timers
>>>
>>> selftests: raw_skew
>>> ========================================
>>> not ok 1..7 selftests:  raw_skew [FAIL]
>>
>> Hrm... Did raw_skew provide any other output?
>>
>> Also, did you turn ntpd off before running?
>>
>> -john
>>
> 
> John/Greg,
> 
> Here is the detailed report fromn this test. I didn't disable ntpd.
> 
> WARNING: ADJ_OFFSET in progress, this will cause inaccurate results
> Estimating clock drift: -16.319(est) -8.913(act)	[FAILED]
> Bail out!
> Pass 0 Fail 0 Xfail 0 Xpass 0 Skip 0 Error 0
> 1..0
> 
> I can keep on eye on this. Not a show stopper for releasing the rc.
> 

Odd. Doesn't fail on 4.14-rc4 and 4.13.6. I will try to isolate the
problem. Definitely follows 4.13-rc7

thanks,
-- Shuah