Re: Does perf-annotate work correctly?
From: Jiri Olsa
Date: Mon Oct 16 2017 - 05:29:21 EST
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 06:15:00PM +0800, Du, Changbin wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
> Sorry, missed you (but get_maintainer.pl doesn't list you). Here is ealier email.
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/12/158
>
> Do you think if this is a real issue?
SNIP
> > 0.02 â test %esi,%esi â
> > â â js 25 â
> > 99.98 â â retq â
> > â25: push %rbp â
> > â mov $0x440a,%ecx â
> > â mov $0x440c,%edx â
> > â vmx_complete_interrupts(): â
> > â break; â
> > â } â
> > â } â
> > â â
> > â static void vmx_complete_interrupts(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx) â
> > â { â
> > â mov %rsp,%rbp â
> > â â callq __vmx_complete_interrupts.part.64 â
> > â __vmx_complete_interrupts(&vmx->vcpu, vmx->idt_vectoring_info, â
> > â pop %rbp â
> > â â retq â
hi,
there's 'o' key to togle the instruction address or you
can use the perf annotate --stdio to get it.. should be
easier to tell if that's the same instruction
jirka