Re: [PATCH] EDAC, sb_edac: mark expected switch fall-through

[Borislav Petkov]

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 03:00:53AM +0000, Zhuo, Qiuxu wrote:
> Hi Silva,
> 
>     The actual intention of the code is NOT to fall through, though current code can work correctly.
>     Thanks for this finding. If you don't mind, I'll submit a fix patch for it with the tag 'Reported-by:' by you.

I'd prefer if Gustavo would submit a patch fixing that, as he caught it
and I'd prefer if you don't top-post on public mailing lists please.

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.