Re: [PATCH 02/20] staging: lustre: lnet: socklnd: mark expected switch fall-through
From: Dilger, Andreas
Date: Tue Oct 17 2017 - 18:56:34 EST
On Oct 12, 2017, at 10:16, Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
This isn't strictly necessary, since LASSERT() never returns, but
not harmful either.
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/socklnd/socklnd.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/socklnd/socklnd.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/socklnd/socklnd.c
> index d0ee58d..7b014ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/socklnd/socklnd.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/socklnd/socklnd.c
> @@ -2308,7 +2308,7 @@ ksocknal_base_shutdown(void)
> switch (ksocknal_data.ksnd_init) {
> default:
> LASSERT(0);
> -
> + /* fall through */
> case SOCKNAL_INIT_ALL:
> case SOCKNAL_INIT_DATA:
> LASSERT(ksocknal_data.ksnd_peers);
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Lustre Principal Architect
Intel Corporation