Re: [PATCH v6] eeprom: at24: Add OF device ID table

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Wolfram,

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:40 PM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> +     {
>> +             .compatible = "atmel,spd",
>> +             .data = (void *)AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(2048 / 8,
>> +                             AT24_FLAG_READONLY | AT24_FLAG_IRUGO)
>> +     },
>
> checkpatch reported this one as un-documented. And come to think of it,
> since this is solely for EEPROMs on RAM modules, I think we can drop a
> DT binding for it. Could you agree? I can do it locally, no need to
> resend. I'll do HW testing later, but wanted to check on your opinion
> already.

Why?

No one has placeholders for memory modules in DT?
In addition, I can imagine a DT overlay for a memory module, adding the
memory node and the EEPROM.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds