Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] livepatch: add atomic replace

[Miroslav Benes]

On Wed, 18 Oct 2017, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 11:10:09AM +0200, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> > 3. Drop immediate. It causes problems only and its advantages on x86_64 
> > are theoretical. You would still need to solve the interaction with atomic 
> > replace on other architecture with immediate preserved, but that may be 
> > easier. Or we can be aggressive and drop immediate completely. The force 
> > transition I proposed earlier could achieve the same.
> 
> I like this idea.  When can we expect v3 of the force patches? :-)

Hopefully soon. First I wanted to eliminate the amount of 
unreaded/unreviewed patches. Almost there. However there is OSS 
next week :/. But soon... :)

Miroslav