On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 12:31:28PM -0700, Scott Branden wrote:
Hi Andrew,I just noticed that you did not also post this to netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx I
On 17-10-18 12:16 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
OK -will add more description to differentiate management processor vs.Yes, there is also a management processor.O.K.
Maybe it would be nice to add some more text to the commit message to
make this clear. Define what an application processor is, and how it
differs from a management processor. But othersize:
application processor(s).
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>I actually wanted to get agreement that the bit define could be added to
I assume you have another kernel patch to actually make use of this?
It is normal to post the user of a new API in the same series as the
API.
ethtool before implementing it in driver.
If this direction approved we'll implement in driver and submit with this
patch series.
suspect you are more likely to get review and acceptance if that list is cc'd.
I'm not positive that Linus will take networking patches off this list.
AndrewThanks,
Scott