Re: [PATCH 7/7] gpio: brcmstb: implement suspend/resume/shutdown

[Gregory Fong]

Hi Doug,

Nice description of the problem with dealing with a pending disabled
wake interrupt and the solution.  A few remarks:

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 08:40:57PM -0700, Doug Berger wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c
> index 752a46ce3589..c964ed71a68d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c
> @@ -19,17 +19,29 @@
>  #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
>  #include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> -#include <linux/reboot.h>
> -
> -#define GIO_BANK_SIZE           0x20
> -#define GIO_ODEN(bank)          (((bank) * GIO_BANK_SIZE) + 0x00)
> -#define GIO_DATA(bank)          (((bank) * GIO_BANK_SIZE) + 0x04)
> -#define GIO_IODIR(bank)         (((bank) * GIO_BANK_SIZE) + 0x08)
> -#define GIO_EC(bank)            (((bank) * GIO_BANK_SIZE) + 0x0c)
> -#define GIO_EI(bank)            (((bank) * GIO_BANK_SIZE) + 0x10)
> -#define GIO_MASK(bank)          (((bank) * GIO_BANK_SIZE) + 0x14)
> -#define GIO_LEVEL(bank)         (((bank) * GIO_BANK_SIZE) + 0x18)
> -#define GIO_STAT(bank)          (((bank) * GIO_BANK_SIZE) + 0x1c)
> +
> +enum gio_reg_index {
> +	GIO_REG_ODEN = 0,
> +	GIO_REG_DATA,
> +	GIO_REG_IODIR,
> +	GIO_REG_EC,
> +	GIO_REG_EI,
> +	GIO_REG_MASK,
> +	GIO_REG_LEVEL,
> +	GIO_REG_STAT,
> +	GIO_REG_COUNT

Please change the name or add a comment to make it clear that this is
not for an actual register.

> +};
> +
> [snip]
> @@ -37,6 +49,8 @@ struct brcmstb_gpio_bank {
>  	struct gpio_chip gc;
>  	struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *parent_priv;
>  	u32 width;
> +	u32 wake_active;
> +	u32 regs[GIO_REG_STAT]; /* Don't save and restore GIO_REG_STAT */

Consider naming to make it clearer that this is for save/restore, not
some kind of shadow reg implementation or anything like that.

>  };
>  
>  struct brcmstb_gpio_priv {
> @@ -49,7 +63,6 @@ struct brcmstb_gpio_priv {
>  	int gpio_base;
>  	int num_gpios;
>  	int parent_wake_irq;
> -	struct notifier_block reboot_notifier;
>  };
>  
>  #define MAX_GPIO_PER_BANK       32
> @@ -65,15 +78,22 @@ brcmstb_gpio_gc_to_priv(struct gpio_chip *gc)
>  }
>  
>  static unsigned long
> -brcmstb_gpio_get_active_irqs(struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank)
> +__brcmstb_gpio_get_active_irqs(struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank)
>  {
>  	void __iomem *reg_base = bank->parent_priv->reg_base;
> +
> +	return bank->gc.read_reg(reg_base + GIO_STAT(bank->id)) &
> +	       bank->gc.read_reg(reg_base + GIO_MASK(bank->id));
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long
> +brcmstb_gpio_get_active_irqs(struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank)
> +{
>  	unsigned long status;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
> -	status = bank->gc.read_reg(reg_base + GIO_STAT(bank->id)) &
> -		 bank->gc.read_reg(reg_base + GIO_MASK(bank->id));
> +	status = __brcmstb_gpio_get_active_irqs(bank);
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
>  
>  	return status;
> @@ -209,11 +229,6 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_priv_set_wake(struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *priv,
>  {
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Only enable wake IRQ once for however many hwirqs can wake
> -	 * since they all use the same wake IRQ.  Mask will be set
> -	 * up appropriately thanks to IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND flag.
> -	 */
>  	if (enable)
>  		ret = enable_irq_wake(priv->parent_wake_irq);
>  	else
> @@ -227,7 +242,17 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_priv_set_wake(struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *priv,
>  static int brcmstb_gpio_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int enable)
>  {
>  	struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> -	struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *priv = brcmstb_gpio_gc_to_priv(gc);
> +	struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> +	struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *priv = bank->parent_priv;
> +	u32 mask = BIT(brcmstb_gpio_hwirq_to_offset(d->hwirq, bank));
> +
> +	/* Do not do anything specific for now, suspend/resume callbacks will
> +	 * configure the interrupt mask appropriately
> +	 */

Please fix comment format (this is the network subsystem style).

> 
> [snip] 
> @@ -508,6 +511,99 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev,
> [...]
> +static void brcmstb_gpio_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	/* Enable GPIO for S5 cold boot */
> +	brcmstb_gpio_quiesce(&pdev->dev, 0);

nit: use false instead of 0 (it's a bool).

> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> [snip]
> +static int brcmstb_gpio_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank;
> +	u32 wake_mask = 0;

This isn't really being used as a mask, contrary to appearances.  It's
just tracking whether any active IRQs were seen.  Please change to use a
bool instead and adjust the name accordingly.

> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(bank, &priv->bank_list, node) {
> +		wake_mask |= __brcmstb_gpio_get_active_irqs(bank);
> +		brcmstb_gpio_bank_restore(priv, bank);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (priv->parent_wake_irq && wake_mask)
> +		pm_wakeup_event(dev, 0);
> +
> +	/* enable non-wake interrupt */
> +	if (priv->parent_irq >= 0)
> +		enable_irq(priv->parent_irq);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#else
> +#define brcmstb_gpio_suspend	NULL
> +#define brcmstb_gpio_resume	NULL
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
> +
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops brcmstb_gpio_pm_ops = {
> +	.suspend_noirq	= brcmstb_gpio_suspend,
> +	.resume_noirq = brcmstb_gpio_resume,
> +};
> +
>  static int brcmstb_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -517,7 +613,7 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	struct resource *res;
>  	struct property *prop;
>  	const __be32 *p;
> -	u32 bank_width;
> +	u32 bank_width, wake_mask = 0;

Same comment on wake_mask as for brcmstb_gpio_resume() above.

>  	int num_banks = 0;
>  	int err;
>  	static int gpio_base;
> @@ -617,6 +713,7 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		 * Mask all interrupts by default, since wakeup interrupts may
>  		 * be retained from S5 cold boot
>  		 */
> +		wake_mask |= __brcmstb_gpio_get_active_irqs(bank);
>  		gc->write_reg(reg_base + GIO_MASK(bank->id), 0);
>  
>  		err = gpiochip_add_data(gc, bank);
> @@ -646,6 +743,9 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	dev_info(dev, "Registered %d banks (GPIO(s): %d-%d)\n",
>  			num_banks, priv->gpio_base, gpio_base - 1);
>  
> +	if (priv->parent_wake_irq && wake_mask)
> +		pm_wakeup_event(dev, 0);

Why is this called in probe?

Thanks,
Gregory