Re: [PATCH 3.18 00/19] 3.18.76-stable review

[Kevin Hilman]

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 04:20:30PM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:
>> stable-rc/linux-3.18.y boot: 39 boots: 3 failed, 36 passed (v3.18.75-20-g4ffe55402429)
>> 
>> Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/branch/linux-3.18.y/kernel/v3.18.75-20-g4ffe55402429/
>> Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/branch/linux-3.18.y/kernel/v3.18.75-20-g4ffe55402429/
>> 
>> Tree: stable-rc
>> Branch: linux-3.18.y
>> Git Describe: v3.18.75-20-g4ffe55402429
>> Git Commit: 4ffe55402429b1be08b48d02b7be9371148c68b6
>> Git URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
>> Tested: 12 unique boards, 6 SoC families, 10 builds out of 182
>> 
>> Boot Failures Detected:
>> 
>> arm:
>> 
>>     omap2plus_defconfig
>>         am335x-boneblack: 1 failed lab
>> 
>>     exynos_defconfig
>>         exynos5800-peach-pi: 1 failed lab
>> 
>>     multi_v7_defconfig
>>         imx6q-sabrelite: 1 failed lab
>
> Thanks for all of the reports.  They all look good except this for 3.18.
> Is this to be expected?

TL;DR; all 3 are lab infrastructure issues, nothing related to the kernel.

Cc'd Guillaume from Collabora to have a look.

@Guillaume: 2 of the 3 boards failed to get a DHCP address from u-boot.
The 3rd one failed to power cycle.

Kevin