Re: [PATCH v3 05/13] irqchip: add initial support for ompic
From: Marc Zyngier
Date: Mon Oct 23 2017 - 04:00:23 EST
On Sun, Oct 22 2017 at 12:15:52 pm BST, Stafford Horne <shorne@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> IPI driver for the Open Multi-Processor Interrupt Controller (ompic) as
> described in the Multi-core support section of the OpenRISC 1.2
> proposed architecture specification:
>
> https://github.com/stffrdhrn/doc/raw/arch-1.2-proposal/openrisc-arch-1.2-rev0.pdf
>
> Each OpenRISC core contains a full interrupt controller which is used in
> the SMP architecture for interrupt balancing. This IPI device, the
> ompic, is the only external device required for enabling SMP on
> OpenRISC.
>
> Pending ops are stored in a memory bit mask which can allow multiple
> pending operations to be set and serviced at a time. This is mostly
> borrowed from the alpha IPI implementation.
>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> [shorne@xxxxxxxxx: converted ops to bitmask, wrote commit message]
> Signed-off-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Changes since v2
> - Fixed some issues with missing static
> - Fixed spelling issue with multi-core
> - Added back #interrupt-cells
>
> Changes since v1
> - Added openrisc, prefix
> - Clarified 8 bytes per cpu
> - Removed #interrupt-cells as this will not be an irq parent
> - Changed ops to be percpu
> - Added DTS and intialization failure validations
>
>
> .../interrupt-controller/openrisc,ompic.txt | 22 +++
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> arch/openrisc/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 3 +
> drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/irqchip/irq-ompic.c | 205 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 6 files changed, 233 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/openrisc,ompic.txt
> create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-ompic.c
[...]
> +static struct irqaction ompi_ipi_irqaction = {
> + .handler = ompic_ipi_handler,
> + .flags = IRQF_PERCPU,
> + .name = "ompic_ipi",
> +};
> +
> +static int __init ompic_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
> +{
> + struct resource res;
> + int irq;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Validate the DT */
> + if (ompic_base) {
> + pr_err("ompic: duplicate ompic's are not supported");
> + return -EEXIST;
> + }
> +
> + if (of_address_to_resource(node, 0, &res)) {
> + pr_err("ompic: reg property requires an address and size");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (resource_size(&res) < (num_possible_cpus() * OMPIC_CPUBYTES)) {
> + pr_err("ompic: reg size, currently %d must be at least %d",
> + resource_size(&res),
> + (num_possible_cpus() * OMPIC_CPUBYTES));
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /* Setup the device */
> + ompic_base = ioremap(res.start, resource_size(&res));
> + if (IS_ERR(ompic_base)) {
> + pr_err("ompic: unable to map registers");
> + return PTR_ERR(ompic_base);
> + }
> +
> + irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
> + if (irq <= 0) {
> + pr_err("ompic: unable to parse device irq");
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_unmap;
> + }
> +
> + ret = setup_irq(irq, &ompi_ipi_irqaction);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_irq_disp;
Is there a particular reason why this cannot be turned request_irq()
call? setup_irq is something we try to avoid these days...
> +
> + set_smp_cross_call(ompic_raise_softirq);
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +out_irq_disp:
> + irq_dispose_mapping(irq);
> +out_unmap:
> + iounmap(ompic_base);
> + ompic_base = NULL;
> + return ret;
> +}
> +IRQCHIP_DECLARE(ompic, "openrisc,ompic", ompic_of_init);
Otherwise looks good to me.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.