Re: [PATCH 07/27] kexec_file: Disable at runtime if securelevel has been set
From: Mimi Zohar
Date: Sat Oct 28 2017 - 19:10:30 EST
On Thu, 2017-10-26 at 10:17 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-10-26 at 15:42 +0800, joeyli wrote:
> > Hi Mimi,
> >
> > Thank you for reviewing.
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:54:43AM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2017-10-19 at 15:51 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> > > > From: Chun-Yi Lee <joeyli.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > When KEXEC_VERIFY_SIG is not enabled, kernel should not loads image
> > > > through kexec_file systemcall if securelevel has been set.
> > >
> > > The patch title and description needs to be updated to refer to
> > > lockdown, not securelevel.
> > >
> > > As previously mentioned the last time these patches were posted, this
> > > leaves out testing to see if the integrity subsystem is enabled.
> > >
> > > Commit 503ceaef8e2e "ima: define a set of appraisal rules requiring
> > > file signatures" was upstreamed. ÂAn additional patch could force
> > > these rules to be added to the custom policy, if lockdown is enabled.
> > > ÂThis and other patches in this series could then check to see if
> > > is_ima_appraise_enabled() is true.
> > >
> > > Mimi
> > >
> >
> > I have updated the patch title and description, and I also added
> > is_ima_appraise_enabled() as the following. Is it good to you?
>
> Yes, that works. ÂThanks! ÂRemember is_ima_appraise_enabled() is
> dependent on the "ima: require secure_boot rules in lockdown mode"
> patch -Âhttp://kernsec.org/pipermail/linux-security-module-archive/201
> 7-October/003910.html.
>
> The IMA "secure_boot" policy can be specified on the boot command line
> as ima_policy="secure_boot". ÂIt requires kernel modules, firmware,
> kexec kernel image and the IMA custom policy to be signed. ÂIn
> lockdown mode, these rules are enabled by default and added to the
> custom policy.
>
> > On the other hand, I am not good on IMA. I have traced the code path
> > in kimage_file_prepare_segments(). Looks that the READING_KEXEC_IMAGE
> > doesn't show in selinux_kernel_read_file(). Where is the exact code
> > in IMA for checking the signature when loading crash kernel file?
>
> kernel_read_file_from_fd() calls the security_kernel_read_file() and
> security_kernel_post_read_file() hooks, which call ima_read_file() and
> ima_post_read_file() respectively.
Hm, with "lockdown" enabled on the boot command line, I'm now able to
do the kexec load, but not the unload. :/ Â After the kexec load with
the "--reuse-cmdline" option, the system reboots, but isn't in
"lockdown" mode.