Re: [PATCH] Coccinelle: use false positive annotation

From: Masahiro Yamada
Date: Sun Oct 29 2017 - 23:48:14 EST


Hi Julia,


2017-10-29 8:43 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx>:
> /// is to describe the semantic patch, while //# indicates reasons
> for false positives.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx>
>
> ---
> scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci
> index d0d00ef..30b248b 100644
> --- a/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci
> +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci
> @@ -3,9 +3,9 @@
> /// Sometimes, code after an if that is indented is actually intended to be
> /// part of the if branch.
> ///
> -/// This has a high rate of false positives, because Coccinelle's column
> -/// calculation does not distinguish between spaces and tabs, so code that
> -/// is not visually aligned may be considered to be in the same column.
> +//# This has a high rate of false positives, because Coccinelle's column
> +//# calculation does not distinguish between spaces and tabs, so code that
> +//# is not visually aligned may be considered to be in the same column.
> ///

Just a nit.

The last /// should be turned into //
if you want to avoid two blank lines in a series
after the semantic patch information.

(I can fix it locally if you agree with it and I am supposed to pick up this.)



> // Confidence: Low
> // Copyright: (C) 2010 Nicolas Palix, DIKU. GPLv2.
>



--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada