Re: IB/mlx4: Use common error handling code in __mlx4_ib_create_flow()

From: Leon Romanovsky
Date: Mon Oct 30 2017 - 04:34:13 EST


On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 09:04:36AM +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> >>> I mean you aren't really making the code any smaller
> >>
> >> Would anybody like to check corresponding effects in more detail
> >> after a specific function call was replaced by a goto statement?
> >
> > You are supposed to do it and not "anybody".
>
> I can offer another bit of information for this software development discussion.
>
> The following build settings were active in my âMakefileâ for this Linux test case.
>
> â
> HOSTCFLAGS = -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -O0 -fomit-frame-pointer -std=gnu89
> â
>
>
> The affected source file can be compiled for the processor architecture âx86_64â
> by a tool like âGCC 6.4.1+r251631-1.3â from the software distribution
> âopenSUSE Tumbleweedâ with the following command example.
>
> my_cc=/usr/bin/gcc-6 \
> && my_module=drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/main.o \
> && git checkout next-20171009 \
> && make -j4 CC="${my_cc}" HOSTCC="${my_cc}" allmodconfig "${my_module}" \
> && size "${my_module}" \
> && git checkout next_fine-tuning_in_mlx4_1 \
> && make -j4 CC="${my_cc}" HOSTCC="${my_cc}" allmodconfig "${my_module}" \
> && size "${my_module}"
>
>
> Do you find the following details useful for further clarification?

Almost, you should compare sizes of mlx4_ib.ko and not drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/main.o.

Thanks

>
> text: -32
> data: 0
> bss: 0
>
> Regards,
> Markus

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature