Re: [PATCH V2] scsi: storvsc: Allow only one remove lun work item to be issued per lun

[Cathy Avery]

On 10/31/2017 08:24 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> > > If you use alloc_ordered_workqueue directly instead of
> > > create_singlethread_workqueue you can pass a format string and don't
> > > need the separate allocation.
> > >
> > > But I'm not sure if Tejun is fine with using __WQ_LEGACY directly..
> > The only thing that flag does is exempting the workqueue from possible
> > flush deadlock check as we don't know whether WQ_MEM_RECLAIM on a
> > legacy workqueue is intentional.  There's no reason to add it when
> > converting to alloc_ordered_workqueue().  Just decide whether it needs
> > forward progress guarantee and use WQ_MEM_RECLAIM if so.
> Cathy?

Sorry for the delay. Long was working on a similar problem and we needed 
to add a couple of extra patches. I was thinking of sending all three in 
series but I can send the V3 of this now and follow up with the 
additional patches. Does that make sense?