Re: possible deadlock in lru_add_drain_all

[Byungchul Park]

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 04:25:32PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> But this report only includes a single (cpu-up) part and therefore is

Thanks for fixing me, Peter. I thought '#1 -> #2' and '#2 -> #3', where
#2 is 'cpuhp_state', should have been built with two different classes
of #2 as the latest code. Sorry for confusing Michal.

> not affected by that change other than a lock name changing.