Re: [RFC] Improving udelay/ndelay on platforms where that is possible

From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Wed Nov 01 2017 - 15:09:25 EST


On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Marc Gonzalez
<marc_gonzalez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> By default, ndelay is implemented in terms of udelay.

That's very much *NOT* the case.

Yes, there is a *fallback* for when somebody doesn't do ndelay() at
all, but that doesn't make it the default.

It's just a "the architecture didn't implement ndelay at all, we'll
work around it".

So stop this idiocy already. About half of what I've seen in this
thread has been pure garbage.

Linus