Re: [PATCH] tty: max3100: remove unused variable rts and remove unused assignment
From: walter harms
Date: Thu Nov 02 2017 - 10:36:43 EST
Am 02.11.2017 15:22, schrieb Colin Ian King:
> On 02/11/17 14:21, Colin Ian King wrote:
>> On 02/11/17 14:14, walter harms wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 02.11.2017 15:01, schrieb Colin King:
>>>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> Variable rts is being assigned but it is never read, hence it can be
>>>> removed. The assignment to param_new to zero is redundant as it is
>>>> being updates a few statements later, so remove this redundant
>>>> assignment. Cleans up two clang warnings:
>>>>
>>>> drivers/tty/serial/max3100.c:277:3: warning: Value stored to 'rts'
>>>> is never read
>>>> drivers/tty/serial/max3100.c:439:2: warning: Value stored to 'param_new'
>>>> is never read
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/tty/serial/max3100.c | 4 +---
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/max3100.c b/drivers/tty/serial/max3100.c
>>>> index b6b3453e8c1f..f691f3cdb5b1 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/max3100.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/max3100.c
>>>> @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ static void max3100_work(struct work_struct *w)
>>>> struct max3100_port *s = container_of(w, struct max3100_port, work);
>>>> int rxchars;
>>>> u16 tx, rx;
>>>> - int conf, cconf, rts, crts;
>>>> + int conf, cconf, crts;
>>>> struct circ_buf *xmit = &s->port.state->xmit;
>>>>
>>>> dev_dbg(&s->spi->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
>>>> @@ -274,7 +274,6 @@ static void max3100_work(struct work_struct *w)
>>>> conf = s->conf;
>>>> cconf = s->conf_commit;
>>>> s->conf_commit = 0;
>>>> - rts = s->rts;
>>>> crts = s->rts_commit;
>>>> s->rts_commit = 0;
>>>> spin_unlock(&s->conf_lock);
>>>> @@ -436,7 +435,6 @@ max3100_set_termios(struct uart_port *port, struct ktermios *termios,
>>>> dev_dbg(&s->spi->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
>>>>
>>>> cflag = termios->c_cflag;
>>>> - param_new = 0;
>>>> param_mask = 0;
>>>>
>>>> baud = tty_termios_baud_rate(termios);
>>>
>>> are you sure ?
>>
>> Yep. So are my compilers
>>
>>>
>>> based on this code:
>>> https://lxr.missinglinkelectronics.com/linux/drivers/tty/serial/max3100.c
>>
>> 438 cflag = termios->c_cflag;
>> 439 param_new = 0;
>> 440 param_mask = 0;
>> 441
>> 442 baud = tty_termios_baud_rate(termios);
>> 443 param_new = s->conf & MAX3100_BAUD;
>>
>> param_new is being updated again on line 440, so line 439 is redundant.
> I mean "again on line 443"
>
yep, i missed 443, sorry for the noise.
re,
wh
>>
>>>
>>> the default case will not set param_new
>>>
>>> re,
>>> wh
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>