RE: [PATCH v16 1/6] drm/i915/gvt: Add framebuffer decoder support
From: Zhang, Tina
Date: Mon Nov 06 2017 - 04:07:53 EST
> -----Original Message-----
> From: intel-gvt-dev [mailto:intel-gvt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Gerd Hoffmann
> Sent: Monday, November 6, 2017 4:49 PM
> To: Zhang, Tina <tina.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>; alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx;
> chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> zhenyuw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Lv, Zhiyuan <zhiyuan.lv@xxxxxxxxx>; Wang, Zhi A
> <zhi.a.wang@xxxxxxxxx>; Tian, Kevin <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>; daniel@xxxxxxxx;
> kwankhede@xxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; intel-gvt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 1/6] drm/i915/gvt: Add framebuffer decoder support
>
> Hi,
>
> > +static struct pixel_format bdw_pixel_formats[] = {
> > + {DRM_FORMAT_C8, 8, "8-bit Indexed"},
>
> > +static struct pixel_format skl_pixel_formats[] = {
> > + {DRM_FORMAT_YUYV, 16, "16-bit packed YUYV (8:8:8:8 MSB-
> > V:Y2:U:Y1)"},
>
> Broadwell and Skylake.
>
> What is the state for newer chipsets?
>
> Is Kabylake supported by gvt meanwhile? Does it need specific fb decoder
> support, or is it compatible with skylake?
Kabylake is supported by gvt. And the fb part should be compatible with skylake. But I haven't tested it yet.
Besides, the current version needs to add some platform checking logic to support Kabylake.
Thanks.
BR,
Tina
>
> cheers,
> Gerd
>
> _______________________________________________
> intel-gvt-dev mailing list
> intel-gvt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gvt-dev