[PATCH 3.2 065/147] ipv6: fix sparse warning on rt6i_node
From: Ben Hutchings
Date: Mon Nov 06 2017 - 18:32:42 EST
3.2.95-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Wei Wang <weiwan@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit 4e587ea71bf924f7dac621f1351653bd41e446cb upstream.
Commit c5cff8561d2d adds rcu grace period before freeing fib6_node. This
generates a new sparse warning on rt->rt6i_node related code:
net/ipv6/route.c:1394:30: error: incompatible types in comparison
expression (different address spaces)
./include/net/ip6_fib.h:187:14: error: incompatible types in comparison
expression (different address spaces)
This commit adds "__rcu" tag for rt6i_node and makes sure corresponding
rcu API is used for it.
After this fix, sparse no longer generates the above warning.
Fixes: c5cff8561d2d ("ipv6: add rcu grace period before freeing fib6_node")
Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <weiwan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2:
- fib6_add_rt2node() has only one assignment to update
- Drop changes in rt6_cache_allowed_for_pmtu()
- Adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
--- a/include/net/ip6_fib.h
+++ b/include/net/ip6_fib.h
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ struct rt6_info {
* the same cache line.
*/
struct fib6_table *rt6i_table;
- struct fib6_node *rt6i_node;
+ struct fib6_node __rcu *rt6i_node;
struct in6_addr rt6i_gateway;
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -4284,7 +4284,7 @@ static void __ipv6_ifa_notify(int event,
* our DAD process, so we don't need
* to do it again
*/
- if (!(ifp->rt->rt6i_node))
+ if (!rcu_access_pointer(ifp->rt->rt6i_node))
ip6_ins_rt(ifp->rt);
if (ifp->idev->cnf.forwarding)
addrconf_join_anycast(ifp);
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ static int fib6_add_rt2node(struct fib6_
rt->dst.rt6_next = iter;
*ins = rt;
- rt->rt6i_node = fn;
+ rcu_assign_pointer(rt->rt6i_node, fn);
atomic_inc(&rt->rt6i_ref);
inet6_rt_notify(RTM_NEWROUTE, rt, info);
info->nl_net->ipv6.rt6_stats->fib_rt_entries++;
@@ -1181,8 +1181,9 @@ static void fib6_del_route(struct fib6_n
int fib6_del(struct rt6_info *rt, struct nl_info *info)
{
+ struct fib6_node *fn = rcu_dereference_protected(rt->rt6i_node,
+ lockdep_is_held(&rt->rt6i_table->tb6_lock));
struct net *net = info->nl_net;
- struct fib6_node *fn = rt->rt6i_node;
struct rt6_info **rtp;
#if RT6_DEBUG >= 2
@@ -1360,7 +1361,10 @@ static int fib6_clean_node(struct fib6_w
res = fib6_del(rt, &info);
if (res) {
#if RT6_DEBUG >= 2
- printk(KERN_DEBUG "fib6_clean_node: del failed: rt=%p@%p err=%d\n", rt, rt->rt6i_node, res);
+ pr_debug("%s: del failed: rt=%p@%p err=%d\n",
+ __func__, rt,
+ rcu_access_pointer(rt->rt6i_node),
+ res);
#endif
continue;
}