[PATCH 3.16 200/294] nilfs2: fix gcc uninitialized-variable warnings in powerpc build

[Ben Hutchings]

3.16.50-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 4f05028f8d1af782cfd03d09e0a052e9745dc5ad upstream.

Some false positive warnings are reported for powerpc build.

The following warnings are reported in
 http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/12519703/

   CC      fs/nilfs2/super.o
 fs/nilfs2/super.c: In function 'nilfs_resize_fs':
 fs/nilfs2/super.c:376:2: warning: 'blocknr' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
 fs/nilfs2/super.c:362:11: note: 'blocknr' was declared here
   CC      fs/nilfs2/recovery.o
 fs/nilfs2/recovery.c: In function 'nilfs_salvage_orphan_logs':
 fs/nilfs2/recovery.c:631:21: warning: 'sum' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
 fs/nilfs2/recovery.c:585:32: note: 'sum' was declared here
 fs/nilfs2/recovery.c: In function 'nilfs_search_super_root':
 fs/nilfs2/recovery.c:873:11: warning: 'sum' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]

Another similar warning is reported in
 http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/12520079/

   CC      fs/nilfs2/btree.o
 fs/nilfs2/btree.c: In function 'nilfs_btree_convert_and_insert':
 include/asm-generic/bitops/non-atomic.h:105:20: warning: 'bh' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
 fs/nilfs2/btree.c:1859:22: note: 'bh' was declared here

This cleans out these warnings by forcing the variables to be initialized.

Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/nilfs2/btree.c    | 2 +-
 fs/nilfs2/recovery.c | 4 ++--
 fs/nilfs2/super.c    | 5 ++++-
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/nilfs2/btree.c
+++ b/fs/nilfs2/btree.c
@@ -1797,7 +1797,7 @@ int nilfs_btree_convert_and_insert(struc
 				   __u64 key, __u64 ptr,
 				   const __u64 *keys, const __u64 *ptrs, int n)
 {
-	struct buffer_head *bh;
+	struct buffer_head *bh = NULL;
 	union nilfs_bmap_ptr_req dreq, nreq, *di, *ni;
 	struct nilfs_bmap_stats stats;
 	int ret;
--- a/fs/nilfs2/recovery.c
+++ b/fs/nilfs2/recovery.c
@@ -582,7 +582,7 @@ static int nilfs_do_roll_forward(struct
 				 struct nilfs_recovery_info *ri)
 {
 	struct buffer_head *bh_sum = NULL;
-	struct nilfs_segment_summary *sum;
+	struct nilfs_segment_summary *sum = NULL;
 	sector_t pseg_start;
 	sector_t seg_start, seg_end;  /* Starting/ending DBN of full segment */
 	unsigned long nsalvaged_blocks = 0;
@@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ int nilfs_search_super_root(struct the_n
 			    struct nilfs_recovery_info *ri)
 {
 	struct buffer_head *bh_sum = NULL;
-	struct nilfs_segment_summary *sum;
+	struct nilfs_segment_summary *sum = NULL;
 	sector_t pseg_start, pseg_end, sr_pseg_start = 0;
 	sector_t seg_start, seg_end; /* range of full segment (block number) */
 	sector_t b, end;
--- a/fs/nilfs2/super.c
+++ b/fs/nilfs2/super.c
@@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ static int nilfs_move_2nd_super(struct s
 	struct nilfs_super_block *nsbp;
 	sector_t blocknr, newblocknr;
 	unsigned long offset;
-	int sb2i = -1;  /* array index of the secondary superblock */
+	int sb2i;  /* array index of the secondary superblock */
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	/* nilfs->ns_sem must be locked by the caller. */
@@ -369,6 +369,9 @@ static int nilfs_move_2nd_super(struct s
 	} else if (nilfs->ns_sbh[0]->b_blocknr > nilfs->ns_first_data_block) {
 		sb2i = 0;
 		blocknr = nilfs->ns_sbh[0]->b_blocknr;
+	} else {
+		sb2i = -1;
+		blocknr = 0;
 	}
 	if (sb2i >= 0 && (u64)blocknr << nilfs->ns_blocksize_bits == sb2off)
 		goto out;  /* super block location is unchanged */