Re: [PATCH 24/31] nds32: Miscellaneous header files
From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Wed Nov 08 2017 - 04:57:49 EST
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 6:55 AM, Greentime Hu <green.hu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> +
> +static inline void __delay(unsigned long loops)
> +{
> + __asm__ __volatile__(".align 2\n"
> + "1:\n"
> + "\taddi\t%0, %0, -1\n"
> + "\tbgtz\t%0, 1b\n"
> + :"=r"(loops)
> + :"0"(loops));
> +}
Does the architecture define a high-resolution clock source? If yes,
then it's better
to use that to get exact timing than to rely on the loop calibration.
> +/*
> + * This file is generally used by user-level software, so you need to
> + * be a little careful about namespace pollution etc. Also, we cannot
> + * assume GCC is being used.
> + */
> +
> +typedef unsigned short __kernel_mode_t;
> +#define __kernel_mode_t __kernel_mode_t
> +
> +typedef unsigned short __kernel_ipc_pid_t;
> +#define __kernel_ipc_pid_t __kernel_ipc_pid_t
> +
> +typedef unsigned short __kernel_uid_t;
> +typedef unsigned short __kernel_gid_t;
> +#define __kernel_uid_t __kernel_uid_t
> +
> +typedef unsigned short __kernel_old_dev_t;
> +#define __kernel_old_dev_t __kernel_old_dev_t
> +
> +#include <asm-generic/posix_types.h>
I don't understand why you would want to override any of those.
Changing them unfortunately means rebuilding all of your user
space, but I think it would be better to do that now than to suffer
from this later on.
Arnd