Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH resend 2/2] userns: control capabilities of some user namespaces

[chris hyser]

On 11/09/2017 01:05 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Would the existing capability bounding set not suffice for that?
>
> The 'permanent' bounding set turns out to not be a good fit for
> the problem being discussed in this thread, but please feel free
> to start a new thread if you want to discuss your use case.

Sure. I will formulate something for a new thread. What seems to be 
asked for here is a way to globally patch the capability sets of a 
entire process subtree.

-chrish