On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 14:29:14 +0200I see the issue now.
"Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)" <y.karadz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
+void trace_graph_register_gui_handler(struct graph_info *info,
+ struct gui_event_handler *handler) {
+ handler->next = info->event_handlers;
+ info->event_handlers = handler;
+}
+
+void trace_view_store_register_gui_handler(TraceViewStore *store, struct gui_event_handler *handler)
+{
+ handler->next = store->event_handlers;
+ store->event_handlers = handler;
+}
+
Hmm, and in the last patch we have:
+ trace_view_store_register_gui_handler(ks_store, switch_handler);
+ trace_view_store_register_gui_handler(ks_store, wakeup_handler);
+
+ trace_graph_register_gui_handler(ks_info->ginfo, switch_handler);
+ trace_graph_register_gui_handler(ks_info->ginfo, wakeup_handler);
I think I see an issue here. ;-)
(Hint, what's the state of switch_handler->next and
wakeup_handler->next, when this is done?)
-- Steve