Re: linux-next: manual merge of the powerpc tree with Linus' tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 12:51:33 +0000 Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the powerpc tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   ac64115a66c1 ("KVM: PPC: Fix oops when checking KVM_CAP_PPC_HTM")
> 
> from Linus' tree and commit:
> 
>   2a3d6553cbd7 ("KVM: PPC: Tie KVM_CAP_PPC_HTM to the user-visible TM feature")
> 
> from the powerpc tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> diff --cc arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> index ee279c7f4802,a3746b98ec11..000000000000
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> @@@ -644,7 -644,8 +644,8 @@@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struc
>   		break;
>   #endif
>   	case KVM_CAP_PPC_HTM:
> - 		r = cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_TM_COMP) && hv_enabled;
>  -		r = is_kvmppc_hv_enabled(kvm) &&
> ++		r = hv_enabled &&
> + 		    (cur_cpu_spec->cpu_user_features2 & PPC_FEATURE2_HTM_COMP);
>   		break;
>   	default:
>   		r = 0;

Just a reminder that this conflict still exists.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell