Re: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the drm tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 20:37:56 +0000 Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_slave_compat.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   44cd3939c111b7 ("drm/tilcdc: Remove redundant OF_DETACHED flag setting")
> 
> from the drm tree and commit:
> 
>   f948d6d8b792bb ("of: overlay: avoid race condition between applying multiple overlays")
> 
> from the devicetree tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_slave_compat.c
> index 482299a6f3b0,54025af534d4..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_slave_compat.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_slave_compat.c
> @@@ -163,12 -162,8 +162,6 @@@ static struct device_node * __init tilc
>   		return NULL;
>   	}
>   
> - 	ret = of_resolve_phandles(overlay);
> - 	if (ret) {
> - 		pr_err("%s: Failed to resolve phandles: %d\n", __func__, ret);
> - 		return NULL;
> - 	}
>  -	of_node_set_flag(overlay, OF_DETACHED);
> --
>   	return overlay;
>   }
>   

Just a reminder that this conflict still exists.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell