On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 04:28:37PM +0800, Mengting Zhang wrote:Yeah, I've checked that function. But perf_event_attr__set_max_precise_ip() will change attr.precise_ip
SNIP
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.cwe already have a function for that, please check perf_event_attr__set_max_precise_ip
index 39b1596..25225f4 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
@@ -1369,6 +1369,32 @@ struct event_modifier {
int pinned;
};
+static int perf_get_max_precise_ip(void)
+{
+ int max_precise_ip = 0;
+ struct perf_event_attr attr = {
+ .type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE,
+ .config = PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES,
+ };
+
+ event_attr_init(&attr);
+
+ attr.precise_ip = 3;
+ attr.sample_period = 1;
+
+ while (attr.precise_ip != 0) {
+ int fd = sys_perf_event_open(&attr, 0, -1, -1, 0);
+ if (fd != -1){
+ close(fd);
+ break;
+ }
+ --attr.precise_ip;
+ }
+ max_precise_ip = attr.precise_ip;
+
+ return max_precise_ip;
+}
also I think the precise level is not generic for all the events,You are right, and I would check it for specific perf_event_attr.
so you should check it for specific perf_event_attr later, when
the attr is ready, not in modifier parsing
thanks,
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-perf-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
.