Re: Adding rseq tree to -next

From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Tue Nov 14 2017 - 23:38:23 EST


Hi Mathieu,

On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 01:22:04 +0000 (UTC) Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ----- On Nov 14, 2017, at 7:15 PM, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 23:54:06 +0000 (UTC) Mathieu Desnoyers
> > <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Would it be possible to add the "rseq" tree to -next for testing ?
> >>
> >> I prepared a branch at:
> >>
> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rseq/linux-rseq.git
> >> branch: rseq/for-next
> >
> > I try not to add new trees during the merge window (the only exceptions
> > are for trees that will remain empty until after the merge window
> > closes or trees only containing material for the current merge window -
> > and in that case it is a bit late and a pain if it interacts with
> > anything else).
> >
> > I will add it after -rc1 is released, though. Please remind me if I
> > forget.
>
> No worries, sorry for the short notice. I'll try to do a merge
> attempt into -next on my end before sending to Linus then.

OK, since you intend to ask Linus to merge it during this merge window,
I have added it from today (I hope I don't regret it too much :-)).

Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-next. As
you may know, this is not a judgement of your code. The purpose of
linux-next is for integration testing and to lower the impact of
conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window.

You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have
been:
* submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's
Signed-off-by,
* posted to the relevant mailing list,
* reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree),
* successfully unit tested, and
* destined for the current or next Linux merge window.

Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him
to fetch). It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx