Re: [PATCH] samples: replace outdated permission statement with SPDX identifiers

From: Greg KH
Date: Thu Nov 16 2017 - 06:41:17 EST

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 09:44:11PM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
> This replaces license permission statements that include a wrong postal
> address of the FSF with only SPDX license identifiers; in the samples
> directory.
> Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger <martink@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> I'll fold this in, in the thread here. I guess this change is what Greg
> had in mind? Or would you prefer having including SPDX and removing
> permission statement seperately?

I have been doing them in 2 steps, but only because the files I modified
were in different "chunks" (i.e. add missing SPDX identifiers to a bunch
of files in a directory, and then the second patch would remove the
license identifiers for all files in that directory). As that type of
patch flow doesn't make sense here, I think what you did was just fine.

Nice job.

Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>