Re: [PATCH 2/4] drm: amd: Fix line continuation formats

From: Harry Wentland
Date: Thu Nov 16 2017 - 10:39:00 EST

Next message: Alex BennÃe: "[PATCH v3 1/3] kvm: arm debug: introduce helper for single-step"
Previous message: Tony Krowiak: "Re: [RFC 06/19] s390/zcrypt: register matrix device with VFIO mediated device framework"
In reply to: Joe Perches: "[PATCH 2/4] drm: amd: Fix line continuation formats"
Next in thread: Joe Perches: "Re: [PATCH 2/4] drm: amd: Fix line continuation formats"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 2017-11-16 10:27 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> Line continuations with excess spacing causes unexpected output.
>
> Miscellanea:
>
> o Added missing '\n' to a few of the coalesced pr_<level> formats
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link_dp.c | 11 ++++-----
> .../amd/powerplay/hwmgr/process_pptables_v1_0.c | 6 ++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/vega10_hwmgr.c | 27 ++++++++--------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/ci_smumgr.c | 6 ++---
> .../gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/iceland_smumgr.c | 9 +++-----
> .../gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/vega10_smumgr.c | 6 ++---
> 6 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link_dp.c
> index ced42484dcfc..6743786afcce 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link_dp.c
> @@ -220,8 +220,7 @@ static void dpcd_set_lt_pattern_and_lane_settings(
> size_in_bytes);
>
> dm_logger_write(link->ctx->logger, LOG_HW_LINK_TRAINING,
> - "%s:\n %x VS set = %x PE set = %x \
> - max VS Reached = %x max PE Reached = %x\n",
> + "%s:\n %x VS set = %x PE set = %x max VS Reached = %x max PE Reached = %x\n",
> __func__,
> DP_TRAINING_LANE0_SET,
> dpcd_lane[0].bits.VOLTAGE_SWING_SET,
> @@ -558,8 +557,7 @@ static void dpcd_set_lane_settings(
> */
>
> dm_logger_write(link->ctx->logger, LOG_HW_LINK_TRAINING,
> - "%s\n %x VS set = %x PE set = %x \
> - max VS Reached = %x max PE Reached = %x\n",
> + "%s\n %x VS set = %x PE set = %x max VS Reached = %x max PE Reached = %x\n",
> __func__,
> DP_TRAINING_LANE0_SET,
> dpcd_lane[0].bits.VOLTAGE_SWING_SET,
> @@ -872,9 +870,8 @@ static bool perform_clock_recovery_sequence(
> if (retry_count >= LINK_TRAINING_MAX_CR_RETRY) {
> ASSERT(0);
> dm_logger_write(link->ctx->logger, LOG_ERROR,
> - "%s: Link Training Error, could not \
> - get CR after %d tries. \
> - Possibly voltage swing issue", __func__,
> + "%s: Link Training Error, could not get CR after %d tries. Possibly voltage swing issue",

Would probably be good to add a '\n' here as well but that's not the main intention of this patch.

Either way patch is
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@xxxxxxx>

Harry

> + __func__,
> LINK_TRAINING_MAX_CR_RETRY);
>
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/process_pptables_v1_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/process_pptables_v1_0.c
> index d1af1483c69b..813f827e4270 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/process_pptables_v1_0.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/process_pptables_v1_0.c
> @@ -523,8 +523,7 @@ static int get_pcie_table(
> if ((uint32_t)atom_pcie_table->ucNumEntries <= pcie_count)
> pcie_count = (uint32_t)atom_pcie_table->ucNumEntries;
> else
> - pr_err("Number of Pcie Entries exceed the number of SCLK Dpm Levels! \
> - Disregarding the excess entries... \n");
> + pr_err("Number of Pcie Entries exceed the number of SCLK Dpm Levels! Disregarding the excess entries...\n");
>
> pcie_table->count = pcie_count;
> for (i = 0; i < pcie_count; i++) {
> @@ -563,8 +562,7 @@ static int get_pcie_table(
> if ((uint32_t)atom_pcie_table->ucNumEntries <= pcie_count)
> pcie_count = (uint32_t)atom_pcie_table->ucNumEntries;
> else
> - pr_err("Number of Pcie Entries exceed the number of SCLK Dpm Levels! \
> - Disregarding the excess entries... \n");
> + pr_err("Number of Pcie Entries exceed the number of SCLK Dpm Levels! Disregarding the excess entries...\n");
>
> pcie_table->count = pcie_count;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/vega10_hwmgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/vega10_hwmgr.c
> index 4f79c21f27ed..9599fe0ba779 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/vega10_hwmgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/vega10_hwmgr.c
> @@ -546,8 +546,7 @@ static void vega10_patch_with_vdd_leakage(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr,
> }
>
> if (*voltage > ATOM_VIRTUAL_VOLTAGE_ID0)
> - pr_info("Voltage value looks like a Leakage ID \
> - but it's not patched\n");
> + pr_info("Voltage value looks like a Leakage ID but it's not patched\n");
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -701,18 +700,14 @@ static int vega10_set_private_data_based_on_pptable(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr)
> table_info->vdd_dep_on_mclk;
>
> PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(allowed_sclk_vdd_table,
> - "VDD dependency on SCLK table is missing. \
> - This table is mandatory", return -EINVAL);
> + "VDD dependency on SCLK table is missing. This table is mandatory", return -EINVAL);
> PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(allowed_sclk_vdd_table->count >= 1,
> - "VDD dependency on SCLK table is empty. \
> - This table is mandatory", return -EINVAL);
> + "VDD dependency on SCLK table is empty. This table is mandatory", return -EINVAL);
>
> PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(allowed_mclk_vdd_table,
> - "VDD dependency on MCLK table is missing. \
> - This table is mandatory", return -EINVAL);
> + "VDD dependency on MCLK table is missing. This table is mandatory", return -EINVAL);
> PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(allowed_mclk_vdd_table->count >= 1,
> - "VDD dependency on MCLK table is empty. \
> - This table is mandatory", return -EINVAL);
> + "VDD dependency on MCLK table is empty. This table is mandatory", return -EINVAL);
>
> table_info->max_clock_voltage_on_ac.sclk =
> allowed_sclk_vdd_table->entries[allowed_sclk_vdd_table->count - 1].clk;
> @@ -3415,8 +3410,7 @@ static int vega10_populate_and_upload_sclk_mclk_dpm_levels(
> DPMTABLE_OD_UPDATE_SCLK)) {
> result = vega10_populate_all_graphic_levels(hwmgr);
> PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(!result,
> - "Failed to populate SCLK during \
> - PopulateNewDPMClocksStates Function!",
> + "Failed to populate SCLK during PopulateNewDPMClocksStates Function!",
> return result);
> }
>
> @@ -3425,8 +3419,7 @@ static int vega10_populate_and_upload_sclk_mclk_dpm_levels(
> DPMTABLE_OD_UPDATE_MCLK)){
> result = vega10_populate_all_memory_levels(hwmgr);
> PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(!result,
> - "Failed to populate MCLK during \
> - PopulateNewDPMClocksStates Function!",
> + "Failed to populate MCLK during PopulateNewDPMClocksStates Function!",
> return result);
> }
> } else {
> @@ -3543,8 +3536,7 @@ static int vega10_populate_and_upload_sclk_mclk_dpm_levels(
> data->apply_optimized_settings) {
> result = vega10_populate_all_graphic_levels(hwmgr);
> PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(!result,
> - "Failed to populate SCLK during \
> - PopulateNewDPMClocksStates Function!",
> + "Failed to populate SCLK during PopulateNewDPMClocksStates Function!",
> return result);
> }
>
> @@ -3552,8 +3544,7 @@ static int vega10_populate_and_upload_sclk_mclk_dpm_levels(
> (DPMTABLE_OD_UPDATE_MCLK + DPMTABLE_UPDATE_MCLK)) {
> result = vega10_populate_all_memory_levels(hwmgr);
> PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(!result,
> - "Failed to populate MCLK during \
> - PopulateNewDPMClocksStates Function!",
> + "Failed to populate MCLK during PopulateNewDPMClocksStates Function!",
> return result);
> }
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/ci_smumgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/ci_smumgr.c
> index 4d672cd15785..ed4b37e566a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/ci_smumgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/ci_smumgr.c
> @@ -1732,8 +1732,7 @@ static int ci_populate_smc_boot_level(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr,
>
> if (0 != result) {
> smu_data->smc_state_table.GraphicsBootLevel = 0;
> - pr_err("VBIOS did not find boot engine clock value \
> - in dependency table. Using Graphics DPM level 0!");
> + pr_err("VBIOS did not find boot engine clock value in dependency table. Using Graphics DPM level 0!\n");
> result = 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1743,8 +1742,7 @@ static int ci_populate_smc_boot_level(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr,
>
> if (0 != result) {
> smu_data->smc_state_table.MemoryBootLevel = 0;
> - pr_err("VBIOS did not find boot engine clock value \
> - in dependency table. Using Memory DPM level 0!");
> + pr_err("VBIOS did not find boot engine clock value in dependency table. Using Memory DPM level 0!\n");
> result = 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/iceland_smumgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/iceland_smumgr.c
> index 34128822b8fb..2ff682d44e8c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/iceland_smumgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/iceland_smumgr.c
> @@ -911,8 +911,7 @@ static int iceland_populate_single_graphic_level(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr,
> hwmgr->dyn_state.vddc_dependency_on_sclk, engine_clock,
> &graphic_level->MinVddc);
> PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE((0 == result),
> - "can not find VDDC voltage value for VDDC \
> - engine clock dependency table", return result);
> + "can not find VDDC voltage value for VDDC engine clock dependency table", return result);
>
> /* SCLK frequency in units of 10KHz*/
> graphic_level->SclkFrequency = engine_clock;
> @@ -1678,8 +1677,7 @@ static int iceland_populate_smc_boot_level(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr,
>
> if (0 != result) {
> smu_data->smc_state_table.GraphicsBootLevel = 0;
> - pr_err("VBIOS did not find boot engine clock value \
> - in dependency table. Using Graphics DPM level 0!");
> + pr_err("VBIOS did not find boot engine clock value in dependency table. Using Graphics DPM level 0!\n");
> result = 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1689,8 +1687,7 @@ static int iceland_populate_smc_boot_level(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr,
>
> if (0 != result) {
> smu_data->smc_state_table.MemoryBootLevel = 0;
> - pr_err("VBIOS did not find boot engine clock value \
> - in dependency table. Using Memory DPM level 0!");
> + pr_err("VBIOS did not find boot engine clock value in dependency table. Using Memory DPM level 0!\n");
> result = 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/vega10_smumgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/vega10_smumgr.c
> index 2f979fb86824..f6f39d01d227 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/vega10_smumgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/vega10_smumgr.c
> @@ -381,10 +381,8 @@ static int vega10_verify_smc_interface(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr)
> (rev_id == 0xc1) ||
> (rev_id == 0xc3)))) {
> if (smc_driver_if_version != SMU9_DRIVER_IF_VERSION) {
> - pr_err("Your firmware(0x%x) doesn't match \
> - SMU9_DRIVER_IF_VERSION(0x%x). \
> - Please update your firmware!\n",
> - smc_driver_if_version, SMU9_DRIVER_IF_VERSION);
> + pr_err("Your firmware(0x%x) doesn't match SMU9_DRIVER_IF_VERSION(0x%x). Please update your firmware!\n",
> + smc_driver_if_version, SMU9_DRIVER_IF_VERSION);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> }
>

Next message: Alex BennÃe: "[PATCH v3 1/3] kvm: arm debug: introduce helper for single-step"
Previous message: Tony Krowiak: "Re: [RFC 06/19] s390/zcrypt: register matrix device with VFIO mediated device framework"
In reply to: Joe Perches: "[PATCH 2/4] drm: amd: Fix line continuation formats"
Next in thread: Joe Perches: "Re: [PATCH 2/4] drm: amd: Fix line continuation formats"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]