Re: [patch V4 01/11] Documentation: Add license-rules.rst to describe how to properly identify file licenses

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Fri Nov 17 2017 - 13:40:00 EST

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 07:11:41PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Introcude a MODULE_LICENSE_SPDX macro which flags the module info storage
> as 'SPDXIFY' and let the postprocessor do:

Shouldn;t this be a FILE_LICENSE_SPDX? I'd also much prefer that over
the nasty C99 comments to start with. And while I'm a bit behind on
email I still haven't managed to find a good rationale for those to
start with.

So it would be good to figure this out before people start spamming
the lists with all kinds of mass conversions and checkpatch fixes
for licensing..