Re: A test of the philosophical impact.. Behaviour problems of "Gnu-Zealots" = Illegal Unix Rip.

[Ywe CÃrlyn]

Den 11/12/2017 11:53, skrev Ywe CÃrlyn:
> Den 11/9/2017 11:55, skrev Ywe CÃrlyn:
> > Den 11/6/2017 19:13, skrev Ywe CÃrlyn:
> > > Den 11/6/2017 11:00, skrev Ywe CÃrlyn:
> > > > Den 11/4/2017 23:53, skrev Ywe CÃrlyn:
> > > > > Den 11/3/2017 07:46, skrev Ywe CÃrlyn:
> > > > > > Den 10/29/2017 17:21, skrev Ywe CÃrlyn:
> > > > > > > Den 10/29/2017 17:00, skrev Ywe CÃrlyn:
> > > > > > > > Den 10/27/2017 23:28, skrev Ywe CÃrlyn:
> > > > > > > > > Den 10/27/2017 23:01, skrev Ywe CÃrlyn:
> > > > > > > > > > Philosophical requantization of a (atm) theoretical linux 
> > > > > > > > > > distribution:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Excellent Ubuntu, is a Good Linux, with a Minimal Jitter Kernel.
> > > > > > > > > > An Available Source Operating System.
> > > > > > > > > > Philosophical Lead: Ywe CÃrlyn.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Desktop Flavour: Customized Gnome
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Finetuned for fast reponsiveness, and smoothness in 
> > > > > > > > > > operation. Configuration of Kernel, for favoring short 
> > > > > > > > > > buffers, lowest latency, minimal jitter, minimal wasted CPU, 
> > > > > > > > > > max cpu utilization.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Perfect scaling, from desktop to supercomputing.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Redefined Internet, with the finest philosophy, and correct 
> > > > > > > > > > attitude.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Call 999-Excellence for a trial CD... No that we donÂt have 
> > > > > > > > > > yet, but how does it sound?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Peace,
> > > > > > > > > > Ywe CÃrlyn.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I have made a good logo 
> > > > > > > > > aswell:http://xn--ywecrlyn-m0a.net/ExcellentUbuntu/ExcellentUbuntu.png 
> > > > > > > > I really believe in this, and what makes this just perfect: 
> > > > > > > > Everyone is their own newsservice, getting their views on for 
> > > > > > > > instance, youtube. And gets the income from this. Which makes a 
> > > > > > > > finely granulated internet economy.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > A test channel: 
> > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCR3gmLVjHS5A702wo4bol_Q
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Peace,
> > > > > > > > Ywe CÃrlyn.
> > > > > > > With Linus Torvalds as patchmeister as usual, ofcourse.
> > > > > > So considering this, and the finely granulated internet economics 
> > > > > > comes from this type of mindset, and with reintergration of it 
> > > > > > back, I would suggest changing the naming scheme of "open 
> > > > > > source", and "free software" to "Available Source". It is 
> > > > > > repeated a lot, and needs to have a corresponding name. (To not 
> > > > > > speak of avoiding uneccesary pointer variables in GNU code... ). 
> > > > > > This is also based on on my conclusion on philosophy research 
> > > > > > over 15 years, and that things need to be right. And even 
> > > > > > metaphysically. For Success. I also CC Richard Stallman on this, 
> > > > > > maybe GNU4.0 will make considerations for this. The hacker will 
> > > > > > now not only be free, but make money. ;)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Peace.
> > > > > Mister GNU Richard Stallman replied me two times on this, since he 
> > > > > did not mail LKML, I will restate them here, for the record.
> > > > >
> > > > > |
> > > > > |[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please 
> > > > > considerÂÂÂ ]]]
> > > > > |[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all 
> > > > > enemies,ÂÂÂÂ ]]]
> > > > > |[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's 
> > > > > example. ]]]|
> > > > > |
> > > > > |It seems that you're making a new variant of GNU/Linux. If you call
> > > > > |it "something Linux", you are talking about our work but giving us
> > > > > |none of the credit. Please call it "something GNU/Linux" so as to
> > > > > |give us equal mention.
> > > > > |
> > > > > |See https://gnu.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html and
> > > > > |https://gnu.org/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html, plus the history in
> > > > > |https://gnu.org/gnu/the-gnu-project.html.
> > > > > |
> > > > > |--
> > > > > |Dr Richard Stallman
> > > > > |President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
> > > > > |Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
> > > > > |Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
> > > > > |
> > > > > And-
> > > > >
> > > > > |
> > > > > |[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please 
> > > > > considerÂÂÂ ]]]
> > > > > |[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all 
> > > > > enemies,ÂÂÂÂ ]]]
> > > > > |[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's 
> > > > > example. ]]]
> > > > > |
> > > > > |"Available source" is too weak a criterion. Free software and open
> > > > > |source stand for categories of software that are nearly coterminous.
> > > > > |However, available source is a much weaker criterion and would
> > > > > |include programs that don't come anywhere near free.
> > > > > |
> > > > > |Also, the point of the free software movement is that users deserve
> > > > > |freedom. "Available source" doesn't even hint at this idea,
> > > > > |so it would not communicate what we want to say.
> > > > > |
> > > > > |
> > > > > |--
> > > > > |Dr Richard Stallman
> > > > > |President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
> > > > > |Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
> > > > > |Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
> > > > > |
> > > > >
> > > > > Not even an acknowledgement on pointer variables from this 
> > > > > self-appointed spokesman for hackers. Or indeed the larger issue 
> > > > > of finegranulated internet economics. How shall an OS indeed 
> > > > > succeed if it chokes its own success?
> > > > >
> > > > > To not speak of the paranoid insertions. Does he fear mountains 
> > > > > shall fall on him, for GNU? Indeed GNU seems to be his qualifier 
> > > > > and god, he slaves to.
> > > > >
> > > > > Or is gnu, a god to slave to, free software your food, and Richard 
> > > > > Stallman its Jesusian son? Will it be up to others to make the 
> > > > > decision?
> > > > >
> > > > > How much is this in conflict with pure hacking, from C64 asm, to 
> > > > > PC C, and the original unix hacking?
> > > > >
> > > > > Have a Mindful Zen moment on this.
> > > >
> > > > As for my own experience, check out my Biit channel where I am 
> > > > going to go through highlights, and do DSP retrofits, remasters etc.
> > > >
> > > > For instance this track: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMfWsx3JBUg
> > > > Uses my own developed absolute minimal psychacoustically corrected 
> > > > phase plateau band EQ. Here I am even using these EQs in serial and 
> > > > parallel on the mix, and on the master, without phaseartifacts. A 
> > > > further developement of the IIR-FIR discussion, into a solution 
> > > > with similar sound of input and output.
> > > >
> > > > Have you ever seen such a thing before? No?. Well I made that.
> > > >
> > > > I also did a custom theme for the app used there. Which will be the 
> > > > principles I will use in "Excellent Ubuntu" aswell.
> > > >
> > > > Peace.
> > >
> > > No list replies. Is this not interesting? I might actually move to 
> > > BSD. The BSD 3-clause licence might be more suitable for this.
> > >
> > > Something else I want is also a subpixel accurate, resolution 
> > > independent desktop compositor. Without tearing, when displaying 
> > > video or similar, and also when recording screen events. (games, 
> > > desktop etc.) Transparent mode changing when necessary, etc. And 
> > > minimal jitter programming.
> > >
> > > So bye for now.
> > Apple changes away from GNU to Apache for CUSP also.
> >
> > So obviously I am not alone in this, and the whole userbase of 
> > OpenBSD seems to be more like me.
> > Seems to be something about the arguments of original unix code, and 
> > if GNU simply tries to be a rip of that. And really never invented 
> > that at all, and is an enemy of this.
> > So if you are like me, then you probably should consider the same. 
> > "Unnud Oddox be with you".
> It seems clear now, that the often criticised behaviour problems of 
> "GNU-Zealots" is due to the "GNU is not Unix" type ripping mentality 
> of Stallman. Ripping Unix was ofcourse illegal in its time. That is 
> ofcourse corrected with OpenBSD, a legal fork of Unix, and instead the 
> three clause BSD licence, which is without all the criticisms of GNU, 
> "Tivoization", and supposedly "legal" knowledge.
>
> I have now included a "no GNU-Zealots" type logo, which also can be 
> obtained from me, if wanted: 
> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCR3gmLVjHS5A702wo4bol_Q
>
> And ofcourse on a larger scale, part of a better internet, an 
> Ultranet, a superweb, with clean news, and social netactivity.
>
>
> Peaceful Saluations.
Btw, Stallmans own "LIbre"-tweak seems to be going in the same 
direction. However as long as GNU really is based on an illegal rip of 
Unix, where he is the frontman, a complete correction is really going to 
a legal fork of Unix, like OpenBSD. Or it still really is just as dodgy 
as Microsofts MS-DOS rip.

My about page is now up on ultranet. http://www.ultranet.life/author-info/