On 19/11/2017 at 09:45:00 +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:Yes, you are right. We should retry to get an irq for device. But ASoC
The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.To ensure this doesn't get applied: platform_get_irq can return
zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
for zero is not correct.
Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@xxxxxxxxx>
---
changes in v2 :
irq was unsigned. so changed it to signed.
changes in v3 :
Add failure case '<= 0' instead of '< 0'. IRQ0 is not valid.
changes in v4 :
Return -ENODEV insted of irq.
-EPROBE_DEFER and this must be handled properly.
(Or maybe this has never caused anything and never failed at all and
nobody cares).
sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c b/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
index bbf7a92..efeecee 100644
--- a/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
+++ b/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
@@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ static int ep93xx_ac97_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct ep93xx_ac97_info *info;
struct resource *res;
- unsigned int irq;
+ int irq;
int ret;
info = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ static int ep93xx_ac97_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return PTR_ERR(info->regs);
irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
- if (!irq)
+ if (irq <= 0)
return -ENODEV;
ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, ep93xx_ac97_interrupt,
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel