Re: [PATCH 4.13 00/28] 4.13.15-stable review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 08:23:20AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 06:13:42AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 11/19/2017 06:43 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.13.15 release.
> > > There are 28 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > > 
> > > Responses should be made by Tue Nov 21 14:42:57 UTC 2017.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > 
> > 
> > Build results:
> > 	total: 145 pass: 143 fail: 2
> > Failed builds:
> > 	arm:allmodconfig
> > 	arm64:allmodconfig
> > Qemu test results:
> > 	total: 123 pass: 107 fail: 16
> > Failed tests:
> > 	arm:beagle:multi_v7_defconfig:omap3-beagle
> > 	arm:beaglexm:multi_v7_defconfig:omap3-beagle-xm
> > 	arm:overo:multi_v7_defconfig:omap3-overo-tobi
> > 	arm:sabrelite:multi_v7_defconfig:imx6dl-sabrelite
> > 	arm:vexpress-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9
> > 	arm:vexpress-a15:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1
> > 	arm:vexpress-a15-a7:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7
> > 	arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:zynq-zc702
> > 	arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:zynq-zc706
> > 	arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:zynq-zed
> > 	arm:midway:multi_v7_defconfig:ecx-2000
> > 	arm:smdkc210:multi_v7_defconfig:exynos4210-smdkv310
> > 	arm64:virt:smp:defconfig
> > 	arm64:xlnx-ep108:smp:defconfig:zynqmp-ep108
> > 	arm64:virt:nosmp:defconfig
> > 	arm64:xlnx-ep108:nosmp:defconfig:zynqmp-ep108
> > 
> > Error ias always the same.
> > 
> > Building arm:allmodconfig ... failed
> > --------------
> > Error log:
> > /opt/buildbot/slave/stable-queue-4.13/build/drivers/crypto/bcm/cipher.c: In function 'mailbox_send_message':
> > /opt/buildbot/slave/stable-queue-4.13/build/drivers/crypto/bcm/cipher.c:266:40: error: request for member 'dev' in something not a structure or union
> >   struct device *dev = &(iproc_priv.pdev->dev);
> 
> Ugh, I missed this yesterday, I'll go try to figure out how I broke
> this, and how my test builds missed this...

Ok, I think I've found it, and now dropped the offending patch.

greg k-h