Re: [RFC PATCH] tpm: don't return -EINVAL if TPM command validation fails

From: Javier Martinez Canillas
Date: Tue Nov 21 2017 - 04:27:38 EST

On 11/21/2017 10:07 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On 11/21/2017 12:15 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>> matters less than breaking the sandbox.
> Yes, sorry for that. It wasn't clear to me that there was a sandbox and my
> lack of familiarity with the code was the reason why I posted as a RFC in
> the first place.
> Do you agree with Jason's suggestion to send a synthesized TPM command in
> the that the command isn't supported?

Sorry, this should had been: send a synthesized TPM response in the case that
the command isn't supported.

Best regards,
Javier Martinez Canillas
Software Engineer - Desktop Hardware Enablement
Red Hat