[PATCH v2 08/18] x86/dumpstack: Handle stack overflow on all stacks
From: Andy Lutomirski
Date: Tue Nov 21 2017 - 23:47:49 EST
We currently special-case stack overflow on the task stack. We're
going to start putting special stacks in the fixmap with a custom
layout, so they'll have guard pages, too. Teach the unwinder to be
able to unwind an overflow of any of the stacks.
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
index 5e7d10e8ca25..635dcbfe2398 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
@@ -90,24 +90,30 @@ void show_trace_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
* - task stack
* - interrupt stack
* - HW exception stacks (double fault, nmi, debug, mce)
+ * - SYSENTER stack
*
- * x86-32 can have up to three stacks:
+ * x86-32 can have up to four stacks:
* - task stack
* - softirq stack
* - hardirq stack
+ * - SYSENTER stack
*/
for (regs = NULL; stack; stack = PTR_ALIGN(stack_info.next_sp, sizeof(long))) {
const char *stack_name;
- /*
- * If we overflowed the task stack into a guard page, jump back
- * to the bottom of the usable stack.
- */
- if (task_stack_page(task) - (void *)stack < PAGE_SIZE)
- stack = task_stack_page(task);
-
- if (get_stack_info(stack, task, &stack_info, &visit_mask))
- break;
+ if (get_stack_info(stack, task, &stack_info, &visit_mask)) {
+ /*
+ * We weren't on a valid stack. It's possible that
+ * we overflowed a valid stack into a guard page.
+ * See if the next page up is valid to that we can
+ * generate some kind of backtrace if this happens.
+ */
+ stack = (unsigned long *)
+ PAGE_ALIGN((unsigned long)stack);
+ if (get_stack_info(stack, task, &stack_info,
+ &visit_mask))
+ break;
+ }
stack_name = stack_type_name(stack_info.type);
if (stack_name)
--
2.13.6