Re: [PATCH 05/62] radix tree: Add a missing cast to gfp_t

[Luc Van Oostenryck]

On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 02:24:02PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 10:28:48PM +0100, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:
> > > -	root->gfp_mask &= (1 << ROOT_TAG_SHIFT) - 1;
> > > +	root->gfp_mask &= (__force gfp_t)((1 << ROOT_TAG_SHIFT) - 1);
> > 
> > IMO, it would be better to define something for that in radix-tree.h,
> > like it has been done for ROOT_IS_IDR.
> 
> If we were keeping the radix tree around, I'd agree, but the point of
> the rest of this patch set is replacing it ;-)  I should probably have
> just dropped this patch, to be honest.

Ah OK, sure.
I confess I didn't saw the whole series, just this patch.

-- Luc