Re: [PULL REQUEST] nfsd changes for 4.15
From: Bruce Fields
Date: Mon Nov 27 2017 - 17:12:56 EST
On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 12:03:45PM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
>
> > On Nov 18, 2017, at 2:40 PM, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 10:40 AM, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Please pull nfsd changes for 4.15 from:
> >
> > Hmm. This had a tracepoint conflict with the nfs client pull.
>
> Guessing you mean:
>
> commit a30ccf1a9eb8c01f37675758f6359a968193d96e
> Author: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
> AuthorDate: Fri Oct 20 10:35:18 2017 -0400
> Commit: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CommitDate: Fri Nov 17 16:43:44 2017 -0500
>
> SUNRPC: Fix parsing failure in trace points with XIDs
>
> mount.nf-11159 8.... 905.248380: xprt_transmit: [FAILED TO PARSE] xid=351291440 status=0 addr=192.168.2.5 port=20049
> mount.nf-11159 8.... 905.248381: rpc_task_sleep: task:6210@1 flags=0e80 state=0005 status=0 timeout=60000 queue=xprt_pending
> kworker/-1591 1.... 905.248419: xprt_lookup_rqst: [FAILED TO PARSE] xid=351291440 status=0 addr=192.168.2.5 port=20049
> kworker/-1591 1.... 905.248423: xprt_complete_rqst: [FAILED TO PARSE] xid=351291440 status=24 addr=192.168.2.5 port=20049
>
> Byte swapping is not available during trace-cmd report.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> conflicted with
>
> commit e9d4bf219c83d09579bc62512fea2ca10f025d93
> Author: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> AuthorDate: Tue Oct 10 17:31:42 2017 -0400
> Commit: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CommitDate: Wed Oct 11 17:08:52 2017 -0400
>
> SUNRPC: Fix tracepoint storage issues with svc_recv and svc_rqst_status
>
> There is no guarantee that either the request or the svc_xprt exist
> by the time we get round to printing the trace message.
>
> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> and that you adjusted a30ccf1a9eb8c01f37675758f6359a968193d96e
> to eliminate the merge conflict.
>
> At a glance I don't see a problem with the finished result.
>
> I could have separated a30ccf1a9eb8c01f37675758f6359a968193d96e
> into a server-side and client-side change.
Thanks, Chuck!
I just noticed I made a separate mistake this time around. For some
reason my pull request only included about the first half of the commits
I had queued up in linux-next.
I have some lame excuse having to do with holiday travel.
Anyway the remainder was just another 20-some bug fixes of various
levels of importance, so I think I'll just send another request for -rc2
tomorrow....
--b.