Re: d7be102f29 ("cfg80211: initialize regulatory keys/database later"): kernel BUG at crypto/asymmetric_keys/public_key.c:80!

From: Kees Cook
Date: Mon Nov 27 2017 - 18:30:34 EST


On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 3:25 PM, David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I'm not seeing why it would ever be ok to do BUG_ON() instead of just
>> returning an error, though.
>
> This function has a list of requisite parameters for the caller:
>
> BUG_ON(!pkey); <-- You need the public key to use,
> BUG_ON(!sig);
> BUG_ON(!sig->digest); <-- the message digest to check
> BUG_ON(!sig->s); <-- and you need the signature.
>
> If you fail to obtain any one of these parameters, you can't use this function
> and you should have errored out before calling this function. It seems
> reasonable for the function to assume that you've provided them - they're kind
> of essential to the operation. If you want, I can just remove the checks
> entirely. Many of the kernel's functions don't perform argument checking, but
> just assume you've done it right and will oops if you haven't.
>
> I could just return -EINVAL, yes, but I'm not sure that's really the right
> thing to do, at least not without printing an error message, since it's a
> kernel programming error not a userspace error or data error.

The preference even in these cases has been to keep things recoverable
unless there is a very good reason to immediately stop the kernel's
thread of execution. If all callers already check for return values,
replacing BUG_ON() with WARN() and returning -EINVAL would be best.

-Kees

--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security