Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] regulator: core: Balance coupled regulators voltages

[Mark Brown]

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 02:47:02PM +0200, Maciej Purski wrote:

> +static void regulator_lock_supply_parents(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> +{
> +	struct regulator_dev *supply = rdev_get_supply(rdev);
> +
> +	if (supply)
> +		regulator_lock_supply(supply);
> +}

These functions are fairly pointless as they're so small, and they're
misnamed as they only lock a single parent but the name suggests it's
going to lock multiple things (I'd expect all the coupled regulators or
something from the name).

> +	/*
> +	 * If the regulator is coupled with other regulators, we have to
> +	 * balance their voltages to keep the max_spread constraint.
> +	 */
> +	if (rdev->coupled_desc)
> +		regulator_balance_coupled(rdev->coupled_desc);

Just put the check into regulator_balance_coupled() rather than doing it
at every call site.

> +	/*
> +	 * If the regulator is coupled, return after changing consumer demands
> +	 * without changing voltage. This will be handled outside the function
> +	 * by regulator_balance_coupled()
> +	 */
> +	if (rdev->coupled_desc)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	ret = regulator_set_voltage_rdev(regulator->rdev, min_uV, max_uV);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto out2;

Where is the elsewhere?  I'm worried this is going to make things more
confusing.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature