[PATCH RT 11/15] iommu/amd: Use raw_cpu_ptr() instead of get_cpu_ptr() for ->flush_queue

[Steven Rostedt]

4.9.65-rt57-rc2 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

get_cpu_ptr() disabled preemption and returns the ->flush_queue object
of the current CPU. raw_cpu_ptr() does the same except that it not
disable preemption which means the scheduler can move it to another CPU
after it obtained the per-CPU object.
In this case this is not bad because the data structure itself is
protected with a spin_lock. This change shouldn't matter however on RT
it does because the sleeping lock can't be accessed with disabled
preemption.

Cc: stable-rt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reported-by: Vinod Adhikary <vinadhy@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
index a88595b21111..ff5c2424eb9e 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
@@ -2283,7 +2283,7 @@ static void queue_add(struct dma_ops_domain *dma_dom,
 	pages     = __roundup_pow_of_two(pages);
 	address >>= PAGE_SHIFT;
 
-	queue = get_cpu_ptr(&flush_queue);
+	queue = raw_cpu_ptr(&flush_queue);
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&queue->lock, flags);
 
 	if (queue->next == FLUSH_QUEUE_SIZE)
@@ -2300,8 +2300,6 @@ static void queue_add(struct dma_ops_domain *dma_dom,
 
 	if (atomic_cmpxchg(&queue_timer_on, 0, 1) == 0)
 		mod_timer(&queue_timer, jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(10));
-
-	put_cpu_ptr(&flush_queue);
 }
 
 
-- 
2.13.2