Re: omapfb/dss: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in three functions

[SF Markus Elfring]

> How many times have I told you to include the reason for your patches
> in your proposed commit message?

Will it be useful to look again at the involved circumstances?


> Too often.

Did I answer any concerns partly?


> Many people do not know that a generic kmalloc does a dump_stack() on OOM.

Do you see a need to represent such information better?

Is it expected that the function âdevm_kzallocâ has got a similar property?


> That information should be part of the commit message.

How do you think about to share it also from any reference documentation
in a clearer way?

Do we stumble on a target conflict in this case?

I am generally trying to improve the software situation to some degree.
I prefer then to work with safe information sources.
Unfortunately, I might have not reached a desired confidence level here
for a more detailed commit message. I assume that software development
efforts could increase in significant ways if something should be improved
further in a direction I hope. But this could mean that time frames will
grow for corresponding clarifications.

* Does such a situation block progress on the deletion of other remaining
  questionable error messages?

* Would you like to increase the software development attention anyhow?



By the way:
It seems that my update suggestion for the directory âomapfb/dssâ
could be superseded by the patch âomapfb: dss: Do not duplicate features dataâ
from Ladislav Michl.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10082027/
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/<20171129123308.GA26578@lenoch>

Regards,
Markus