Re: [PATCH] iio: accel: bmc150: Add OF device ID table

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 01-12-17 12:10, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The driver doesn't have a struct of_device_id table but supported devices
> are registered via Device Trees. This is working on the assumption that a
> I2C device registered via OF will always match a legacy I2C device ID and
> that the MODALIAS reported will always be of the form i2c:<device>.
>
> But this could change in the future so the correct approach is to have an
> OF device ID table if the devices are registered via OF.
>
> The I2C device ID table entries have the .driver_data field set, but they
> are not used in the driver so weren't set in the OF device table entries.
>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
>   drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel-i2c.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel-i2c.c b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel-i2c.c
> index f85014fbaa12..8ffc308d5fd0 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel-i2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel-i2c.c
> @@ -81,9 +81,21 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id bmc150_accel_id[] = {
>   
>   MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, bmc150_accel_id);
>   
> +static const struct of_device_id bmc150_accel_of_match[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "bosch,bmc150_accel" },
> +	{ .compatible = "bosch,bmi055_accel" },

These look a bit weird, there is no reason to mirror the i2c_device_ids
here and typically for devicetree / of we only list
the chip model without some postfix like _accel.

Also if you're doing this you should probably add a:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/bmc150.txt
file documenting the compatible strings, and Cc:
devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for the next version,
so that the devicetree maintainers get a chance to review
this.

> +	{ .compatible = "bosch,bma255" },
> +	{ .compatible = "bosch,bma250e" },
> +	{ .compatible = "bosch,bma222e" },
> +	{ .compatible = "bosch,bma280" },
> +	{ },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, bmc150_accel_of_match);
> +
>   static struct i2c_driver bmc150_accel_driver = {
>   	.driver = {
>   		.name	= "bmc150_accel_i2c",
> +		.of_match_table = bmc150_accel_of_match,
>   		.acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(bmc150_accel_acpi_match),
>   		.pm	= &bmc150_accel_pm_ops,
>   	},

Otherwise looks good to me,

Regards,

Hans