Re: [PATCH v2] kernel/kprobes: add re-register safe check for register_kretprobe()
From: Masami Hiramatsu
Date: Mon Dec 04 2017 - 03:35:30 EST
On Fri, 1 Dec 2017 20:09:06 +0800
JianKang Chen <chenjiankang1@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Jiankang Chen <chenjiankang1@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> When there are two same struct kretprobe rp, the INIT_HLIST_HEAD()
> will result in a empty list table rp->free_instances. The memory leak
> will happen. So it needs to add re-register safe check by
> __get_valid_kprobe().
>
> However, current this is not safe for multi-threadings, because
> there is still a chance to re-register kretprobe concurrently.
> So I add a kretprobe_mutex lock to protect the INIT_LIST_HEAD
>
> And we use rcu read lock to protect the rcu list for __get_valid_kprobe
Looks good to me :)
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thank you!
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiankang Chen <chenjiankang1@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/kprobes.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> index a1606a4..f8f027a 100644
> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@
>
> /* This protects kprobe_table and optimizing_list */
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(kprobe_mutex);
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(kretprobe_mutex);
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe *, kprobe_instance) = NULL;
> static struct {
> raw_spinlock_t lock ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
> @@ -1919,6 +1920,7 @@ int register_kretprobe(struct kretprobe *rp)
> struct kretprobe_instance *inst;
> int i;
> void *addr;
> + struct kprobe *kp;
>
> if (!kprobe_on_func_entry(rp->kp.addr, rp->kp.symbol_name, rp->kp.offset))
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -1947,6 +1949,15 @@ int register_kretprobe(struct kretprobe *rp)
> rp->maxactive = num_possible_cpus();
> #endif
> }
> +
> + mutex_lock(&kretprobe_mutex);
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + kp = __get_valid_kprobe(&rp->kp);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + if (kp) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> raw_spin_lock_init(&rp->lock);
> INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&rp->free_instances);
> for (i = 0; i < rp->maxactive; i++) {
> @@ -1954,7 +1965,8 @@ int register_kretprobe(struct kretprobe *rp)
> rp->data_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (inst == NULL) {
> free_rp_inst(rp);
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out;
> }
> INIT_HLIST_NODE(&inst->hlist);
> hlist_add_head(&inst->hlist, &rp->free_instances);
> @@ -1965,6 +1977,8 @@ int register_kretprobe(struct kretprobe *rp)
> ret = register_kprobe(&rp->kp);
> if (ret != 0)
> free_rp_inst(rp);
> +out:
> + mutex_unlock(&kretprobe_mutex);
> return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(register_kretprobe);
> --
> 1.7.12.4
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>