Re: [PATCH] tracing: Fix trace_preempt_{on,off} for !CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT builds

[Patrick Bellasi]

On 04-Dec 06:26, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon,  4 Dec 2017 09:46:42 +0000
> Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > The new preempt enable/disable events introduced by:
> > 
> >  d59158162 tracing: Add support for preempt and irq enable/disable events
> > 
> > are defined only for CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT kernels when the
> > CONFIG_PREEMPTIRQ_EVENTS support, introduced by the above patch, is
> > enabled.
> > 
> > These events are generated within by trace_preempt_{on,off} calls,
> > which are part of the the "Preemption-off Latency Tracer"
> > (CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER).
> > 
> > Currently these calls are (correctly) generated on CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER
> > even when the kernel is !CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT configured. Thus leading
> > to an undefined reference to the new trace events.
> > 
> > Let's ensure that we always have an (eventually) empty definition of the
> > events for CONFIG_PREEMPTIRQ_EVENTS kernels.
> > 
> > This patch will ensure that the additional preempt enabled/disable
> > events are generated only when we have both:
> >  CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER && CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@xxxxxxx>
> 
> Thanks, but you're the third person to send me a fix for this. I have
> the first fixed applied to my code based off of 4.14-rc1 but that
> branch breaks my tests. I was waiting for rc2 to come out (which just
> happened), to rebase on and run my tests. I'll do that now.

No problems, I did not notice previous fixes.

> Thanks,
> 
> -- Steve
Cheers Patrick

-- 
#include <best/regards.h>

Patrick Bellasi