Re: [lkp-robot] [x86/entry/64] 63e02a2a32: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -13.0% regression

From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Mon Dec 04 2017 - 12:27:21 EST

Next message: Mika Westerberg: "Re: [PATCH][next] pinctrl: intel: ensure error return ret is initialized"
Previous message: Jose Abreu: "Re: xf86-video-armada via UDL [was: Re: UDL's fbdev doesn't work for user-space apps]"
In reply to: Andy Lutomirski: "Re: [lkp-robot] [x86/entry/64] 63e02a2a32: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -13.0% regression"
Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [lkp-robot] [x86/entry/64] 63e02a2a32: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -13.0% regression"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, 3 Dec 2017, Andy Lutomirski wrote:

> Thomas, has my fix for this landed?

It's in the new series.

tglx

Next message: Mika Westerberg: "Re: [PATCH][next] pinctrl: intel: ensure error return ret is initialized"
Previous message: Jose Abreu: "Re: xf86-video-armada via UDL [was: Re: UDL's fbdev doesn't work for user-space apps]"
In reply to: Andy Lutomirski: "Re: [lkp-robot] [x86/entry/64] 63e02a2a32: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -13.0% regression"
Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [lkp-robot] [x86/entry/64] 63e02a2a32: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -13.0% regression"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]