Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] at24: support eeproms that do not auto-rollover reads.

[Sven Van Asbroeck]

> If this is truly specific to at24, then vendor prefix would be appropriate,
> plus it'd go to an at24 specific binding file. However if it isn't I'd just
> remove the above sentence. I guess the latter?

Yes, no-read-rollover is truly specific to at24.c, because it applies only
to i2c multi-address chips. The at25 is spi based so cannot have multiple
addresses.

So yes, "at24,no-read-rollover" would perhaps be a better name.

Regarding an at24 specific binding file. You're saying I should create
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt ? Should I indicate
that at24.txt "inherits from" eeprom.txt? Note that at25.txt does not
currently do this.