Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 21/21] drivers/vhost: Remove now-redundant read_barrier_depends()
From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Date: Tue Dec 05 2017 - 14:24:36 EST
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 08:17:33PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 08:57:46PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> > I don't see WRITE_ONCE inserting any barriers, release or
> > write.
>
> Correct, never claimed there was.
>
> Just saying that:
>
> obj = READ_ONCE(*foo);
> val = READ_ONCE(obj->val);
>
> Never needs a barrier (except on Alpha and we want to make that go
> away). Simply because a CPU needs to complete the load of @obj before it
> can compute the address &obj->val. Thus the second load _must_ come
> after the first load and we get LOAD-LOAD ordering.
>
> Alpha messing that up is a royal pain, and Alpha not being an
> active/living architecture is just not worth the pain of keeping this in
> the generic model.
>
Right. What I am saying is that for writes you need
WRITE_ONCE(obj->val, 1);
smp_wmb();
WRITE_ONCE(*foo, obj);
and this barrier is no longer paired with anything until
you realize there's a dependency barrier within READ_ONCE.
Barrier pairing was a useful tool to check code validity,
maybe there are other, better tools now.
--
MST