Re: [PATCH 2/2] eeprom: at24: use a common prefix for all symbols in at24.c
From: Bartosz Golaszewski
Date: Wed Dec 06 2017 - 06:21:36 EST
2017-12-06 12:05 GMT+01:00 Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx>:
> 2017-12-06 12:03 GMT+01:00 Uwe Kleine-KÃnig <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 11:19:26AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>> There are a couple symbols defined in the driver source file which are
>>> missing the at24_ prefix. This patch fixes that.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
>>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
>>> index 2426f2c111c7..4ead21d0dcc5 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
>>> @@ -93,17 +93,17 @@ struct at24_data {
>>> *
>>> * This value is forced to be a power of two so that writes align on pages.
>>> */
>>> -static unsigned int io_limit = 128;
>>> -module_param(io_limit, uint, 0000);
>>> -MODULE_PARM_DESC(io_limit, "Maximum bytes per I/O (default 128)");
>>> +static unsigned int at24_io_limit = 128;
>>> +module_param(at24_io_limit, uint, 0000);
>>> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(at24_io_limit, "Maximum bytes per I/O (default 128)");
>>
>> You change the names of the module parameters here. I think this is not
>> a good idea as now you have to pass
>>
>> at24.at24_io_limit=...
>>
>> on the kernel command line. If you still want this change, I think there
>> is some documentation that needs adaption, too.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Uwe
>>
>>
>> --
>> Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-KÃnig |
>> Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
>
> Ugh, right, this must stay as it was. Thanks!
>
Actually we can use module_param_named() here. I'll send a v2.
Thanks,
Bartosz