Re: [PATCH] docs: refcount_t documentation

[Kees Cook]

On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue,  5 Dec 2017 12:46:35 +0200
> Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Some functions from refcount_t API provide different
>> memory ordering guarantees that their atomic counterparts.
>> This adds a document outlining these differences (
>> Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst) as well as
>> some other minor improvements.
>
> This seems generally good to me.  Did you want me to take it through the
> docs tree (including the refcount.h change) or did you have some other
> path in mind?

FWIW, I had assumed this would go via the docs tree.

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security